tirsdag 31. januar 2017

Trump`s travel ban - Curt Lewis


Airlines Scramble to Adjust to Trump's New World

Carriers seek clarity as passenger lawyers say American border officers are pressuring green card holders.

As new U.S. travel rules plunged several large American airports into chaos, lawyers for some travelers who are long-term legal residents said the government had urged them to relinquish their status as a requirement for reentering the country.

This was among the more curious developments over a weekend in which a Trump administration order restricting entry into America was met with condemnation abroad and furious protests at home. The official U.S. document, Form I-407, "record of abandonment of lawful permanent resident status," was distributed on several aircraft that landed this weekend at Los Angeles International Airport, said Rachel Odio, an immigration lawyer with pro-bono law firm Public Counsel. Other travelers saw the forms after they had been detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection employees in the airport, she said.


U.S. DHS
Public Counsel assisted about 50 travelers detained at LAX since the Trump's executive order was issued Friday. Several federal courts subsequently temporarily restricted full enforcement of the ban as constitutional challenges move forward. A spokeswoman for the CBP didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.

"It's absurd. There's no legal basis for it," Odio said of the requests to renounce residency. Because many of the forms are being signed "under duress" in isolated airport rooms without access to family, attorney representation, or even food, "there is definitely a strong argument that their signature is without consent."

Airlines seeking clarity

Trump imposed the travel ban on people from seven predominantly Muslim nations: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Sudan, and Yemen. The policy didn't include several nations with ties to past U.S. terror attacks or where Trump's companies do business, including Egypt, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia.

On Monday, Trump attempted to blame the upheaval on a technical glitch at Delta Air Lines Inc., though the glitch occurred two full days after his order was issued and after protests had begun. Delta didn't respond to Bloomberg's queries about the president's comment.

The International Association of Air Transport (IATA) said the executive order "placed additional burdens on airlines to comply with unclear requirements" and imposed implementation costs and penalties. IATA is seeking "clarity" from the U.S. administration. "Moreover, we urge all governments to provide sufficient advance coordination of changes in entry requirements so that travelers can clearly understand them and airlines can efficiently implement them," the Geneva-based group said in a statement.

Lufthansa spokeswoman Christina Semmel said the travel changes have caused only "a few recorded cases" whereby the airline hasn't allowed a customer to travel to the U.S. "Customers who have been affected by these new regulations are offered a free rebooking or are given a full refund," she wrote in an e-mail. A New York-based spokeswoman for British Airways, Michele Kropf, said none of the carrier's customers had been refused entry to the U.S. due to the order. Emirates, which said it has changed some flight staffing to comply with the U.S. requirements, is offering refund and travel rebooking options for people affected.

In a statement, Air France said it was "obliged to offload 15 passengers" from nations subject to the U.S. decree, while KLM informed seven passengers on Saturday that they could not fly to the U.S. "Air France's main concern is to protect its customers, including the possible consequences of arriving in a country they are not allowed to enter, and to limit the inconvenience caused to them by the decision of the U.S. authorities," the airline said. KLM, its sister carrier under the same ownership group, said it "regrets the inconvenience caused to its passengers who were confronted with this sudden change of circumstances."

Green card question

Ally Bolour, an immigration lawyer in Los Angeles, said he was told by one traveler from a Qatar Airways Ltd. flight from Doha that U.S. officials had distributed the 407 forms before passengers disembarked. He said attorneys at the airport had tried to circulate word to passengers not to sign the forms. "Nobody I had talked to who had come through [immigration] had signed," Bolour said on Monday, calling the situation "highly, highly unusual." A spokeswoman for Qatar Airways didn't immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

A counter-protester, right, holds a sign and chants in front of other demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport, on Jan. 29, 2017.
A counter-protester, right, holds a sign and chants in front of other demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport, on Jan. 29, 2017. Photographer: Dania Maxwell/Bloomberg
Several travelers at LAX also reported that customs officials had asked a variety of questions about their travel, including one about Trump, Bolour said. "The one question that stuck out to them was 'Do you like Trump?'" he said. "It's very bizarre. But that was a question."

On Sunday, the Trump administration slightly loosened the restrictions for those with long-term U.S. resident status, saying those travelers would be admitted subject to "case-by-case determinations."

"When you're an LTR (long-term resident) you present your passport, you present your green card and they say 'Welcome home,'" Bolour said. "That's what's supposed to happen."

It was unclear exactly why the U.S. would seek to reduce the number of long-term residents, many of whom obtained green cards through marriage. "I have no idea why the government would be trying to have these people sign these forms except maybe to reduce the number of those people from these countries who reside in the U.S.," Odio said. "It's really terrifying."

Trump Immigration Ban Makes U.S. Airlines Less Secure

Christine Negroni , CONTRIBUTOR
I write about aviation and travel.

A flight departs Newark. Photo by Christine Negroni

The flight attendant, a green-card holding German citizen working for a U.S. airline was clear: "I don't know where I belong," she told me on Saturday evening.

Trump's immigration ban, hastily applied to seven countries, does not include Germany, but the flight attendant has lost confidence in America and is thinking about leaving. She symbolizes the uncertainty spreading across the airline industry following Trump's executive order and it may be responsible in Monday's slump in stock prices for U.S. airlines.

Legal residents of America are holding back on international travel, experts tell me in light of new questions about who may and may not be allowed to enter the country.

"You've got a valid visa, you've been vetted for a year or more, you were an interpreter for the special forces, you saved lives and you are shit out of luck," said a former head of a large domestic airline, who agreed to speak to me so long as he was not identified.

"There are arguably tens of thousands of people who are frozen in place in the U.S.," he said, creating havoc for their employers and for the airlines that would have transported them, not a small number whom would have flown in lucrative business class seats.

And what of the airline employees? American carriers may not employ many pilots and flight attendants from the seven named countries, (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen) but the impact could be considerable on Emirates, Etihad and Qatar, airlines with a large Arabic-speaking customer base and which fly to several cities in the U.S.

"They may have entire crews that may be impacted, where scheduling has to say 'you cannot fly these flights,'" said John McDonald, a former executive vice president at American Airlines who runs the consulting firm, Caeli Communications.

"There doesn't appear to be an understanding or appreciation of how the system works," McDonald said.

The speed with which the order was applied, so that legal entrants were transformed into undesirables as they were America-bound, seemed designed to create maximum chaos. It was unlike previous changes in immigration policy where airlines were informed in advance and travelers were advised before departing for America.
Emirates airline changes pilots and flight crew on US flights because of Donald Trump 'Muslim travel ban'

Abu Dhabi's Etihad Airways and Germany's Lufthansa also affected by the new US policies

Dubai-based carrier has 11 flights to US cities each day Getty
Emirates airline is reportedly changing its pilots and cabin crews on flights to the United States following Donald Trump's executive order banning travel from several Muslim-majority countries.

The Dubai-based carrier, which has 11 flights to US cities each day, made "the necessary adjustments to our crewing, to comply with the latest requirements," an Emirates spokeswoman told Reuters on Sunday

The President's executive order temporarily suspended refugees and immigrants travelling from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the US.

Reuters reports the ban also applies to pilots and flight attendants from those seven countries, even though all flight crew who are not US citizens already need a special visa to enter the country.

Protests across American airports in response to Trump's immigration ban
The impact of the ban on operations would be minimal, another spokeswoman told the agency, as Emirates employs over 23,000 flight attendants and around 4,000 pilots from around the world.

Abu Dhabi's Etihad Airways told Reuters the airline had "taken steps to ensure there will be no issues for flights departing over the coming weeks" while Germany's Lufthansa confirmed airlines and passengers were required to follow the new rules.

Separately, Etihad said a number of its passengers had been affected by the new US immigration policies.

The carrier said it is offering affected passengers refunds or flight changes where possible.

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar

Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.